Assesment Schedule Metode Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Menggunakan Software Primavera P6 Studi Kasus Proyek Jembatan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55606/isaintek.v9i1.402Keywords:
DCMA, Primavera P6, schedule proyek, penjadwalan konstruksi, pengendalian proyek, jembatan pile slabAbstract
Project scheduling is a critical aspect of ensuring the successful implementation of construction projects, particularly bridge projects that involve a high degree of complexity. Poor schedule quality may result in project delays, inaccurate critical path identification, and inadequate project control. This study aims to evaluate the schedule quality of a pile slab bridge project using the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) 14-Point Schedule Assessment method, supported by Oracle Primavera P6 software. The study employed a quantitative descriptive method with a case study approach applied to an existing baseline schedule. The assessment results indicate that several parameters have satisfied the DCMA standards, including relationship type, hard constraints, soft constraints, negative float, large duration, and invalid progress. Conversely, several parameters remain non-compliant with the established standards, namely network logic, positive lag, large float, resources/cost, and the Baseline Execution Index (BEI). This study concludes that the project schedule has not fully adhered to the principles of a network-driven schedule and continues to function primarily as an administrative time schedule. The findings of this study offer practical contributions to construction project management by providing recommendations that encompass the refinement of network logic relationships, reduction of excessive lag usage, implementation of resource and cost loading, and progress updates based on the established baseline, thereby enabling the schedule to serve as a more effective, reliable, and integrated project control tool
References
Acebes, F., Poza, D., Gonzalez-Varona, J. M., Pajares, J., & Lopez-Paredes, A. (2024). On the Project Risk Baseline: Integrating Aleatory Uncertainty into Project Scheduling.
Arifuddin, R., Fatimah, A. N., & Fadlillah, M. R. (2024). Analysis of Scheduling Method in Building Projects: A Case of Line of Balance and Precedence Diagram Method. MEDIA KOMUNIKASI TEKNIK SIPIL, 30(2), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v30i2.63963
Aulia, R., Setiono, D., & Rifai, M. (2023). Analisis Kualitas Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi terhadap Keterlambatan Proyek Jembatan. Jurnal Teknik Sipil dan Infrastruktur, 8(2), 115–124.
Boyle, J. (2021). DCMA 14-Point Schedule Assessment Guide and Best Practices for Project Scheduling. New York: Project Controls Institute.
Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). (2012). DCMA 14-Point Assessment. Washington DC: Defense Contract Management Agency.
Dubey, R., Bandewar, S., & Patel, V. (2023). Implementation of Primavera P6 for Construction Project Monitoring and Schedule Control. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 12(4), 45–53.
Elshaer, R., Marzouk, M., & El-Said, M. (2023). Automated Schedule Quality Assessment Framework for Construction Projects Using Primavera P6 Data. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(11), 04023112.
Hong, Y., Xie, S., Hovhannisyan, V., & Brilakis, I. (2022). A Graph-Based Approach for Unpacking Construction Sequence Analysis to Evaluate Schedules. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 52, 101625.
Karim, A., Widiastuti, E., & Yuliana, C. (2025). Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi Bertingkat Menggunakan Metode Precedence Diagram Method. Jurnal Konstruksi, 23(1), 97–107.
Kim, B., & Reinschmidt, K. F. (2021). Analysis of Schedule Logic and Activity Overlapping in Construction Project Scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8), 04021089.
Kostrzewa-Demczuk, P. (2024). Construction Schedule versus Various Constraints and Risks. Applied Sciences, 14(1), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010196
Malyusz, L., Hajdu, M., & Vattai, Z. (2021). Comparison of Different Algorithms for Time Analysis for CPM Schedule Networks. Automation in Construction, 127, 103697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103697
Nashri, N., & Syamsuri, S. (2025). Analisis Penjadwalan Dengan Metode Precedence Diagram Method Pada Proyek Revitalisasi Gedung SDN 21 Salomenraleng Kecamatan Tempe Kabupaten Wajo. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Lamappapoleonro, 4(1).
Patel, R., & Nema, P. (2022). Modern Project Scheduling Techniques Using Primavera P6 in Construction Management. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 13(1), 88–96.
Project Management Institute (PMI). (2021). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Newtown Square, PA: Project Management Institute.
Sari, D. P., Nugroho, A., & Hidayat, T. (2024). Evaluasi Kinerja Penjadwalan Proyek Konstruksi Menggunakan Primavera P6 dan Earned Value Management. Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil, 20(2), 145–156.
Thuda, J., Tjakra, J., & Pratasis, P. (2024). Penerapan Oracle Primavera P6 pada Pengendalian Waktu Proyek Konstruksi. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 12(1), 33–42.
Watermeyer, K., & Zimmermann, J. (2023). A Constructive Branch-and-Bound Algorithm for the Project Duration Problem with Partially Renewable Resources and General Temporal Constraints. Journal of Scheduling, 26, 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10951-022-00735-9
Wijanarko, A., Purwaningsih, R., & Silviana, S. (2024). Evaluasi Manajemen Waktu Penyelesaian Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Terminal Petikemas Tanjung Emas Semarang dengan CPM dan PERT. Jurnal Profesi Insinyur Indonesia, 2(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.14710/jpii.2024.23914
Zhang, S., Liu, J., Li, Z., Xiahou, X., & Li, Q. (2024). Analyzing Critical Factors Influencing the Quality Management in Smart Construction Site: A DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC Based Approach. Buildings, 14(8), 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082400
